0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÔ¿øȯÀÚ °£È£°ü¸®·á Â÷µîÁ¦ µµÀÔÀÌÈÄ °£È£»ç È®º¸¼öÁØÀÇ º¯È­

Changes in Hospital Nurse Staffing after Implementing Differentiated Inpatient Nursing Fees by Staffing Grades

°£È£ÇàÁ¤ÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 14±Ç 2È£ p.167 ~ 175
KMID : 0614820080140020167
Á¶¼ºÇö ( Cho Sung-Hyun ) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Àü°æÀÚ ( June Kyung-Ja ) - ¼øõÇâ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
±èÀ±¹Ì ( Kim Yun-Mi ) - À»Áö´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¹Úº¸Çö ( Park Bo-Hyun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ º¸°Ç´ëÇпø

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the changes in nurse staffing in hospitals after implementing the policy of differentiating inpatient nursing fees by staffing grades.

Method: The study sample included 43 tertiary hospitals, 185 general hospitals, and 282 non-general hospitals that were operating in both 1999 and 2008. Nurse staffing grade was categorized from Grade 1 (highest) to 6 (lowest) in 1999 or Grade 7 in 2008, based on the nurse-to-bed ratio.

Results: Tertiary hospitals at Grade 3 and Grade 4 accounted for 49% and 35%, respectively, in 2008, whereas 63% were Grade 6 in 1999. General hospitals at Grade 6 decreased from 87% to 48%. In non-general hospitals, little change was found in the staffing distribution, in that 92% still remained in Grade 6 or 7 in 2008. Forty tertiary hospitals (93%) and 45% of general hospitals improved their staffing grades, while only 7% of non-general hospitals did. Greater likelihood of improvement in staffing grades was found in general hospitals located in metropolitan areas or having 250 or more beds.

Conclusion:Elaboration of the financial incentive system is needed to increase the policy impact on staffing improvement.
KeyWords
°£È£»ç, °£È£°ü¸®·á, º´¿ø, ÀηÂÈ®º¸¼öÁØ
Nurse staffing, Hospital, Financial incentive
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
  
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed